Then the allegation that we are "an illegal hotel boycott against third party distributors" because it has "requirements for posting fare sales that cannot be sold" by others in and dearborn and mi is not true? hotel It is absolutely not true, and those who have made that in and dearborn allegation mi had absolutely no basis for hotel making in it. Our agreements dearborn contain no boycott against mi and hotel any distributors whatsoever, and in fact affirmatively provide that no airline is precluded in from dearborn utilizing mi any other distribution hotel channel or offering any fare through in and dearborn and mi any channel. hotel The Department of Justice is presently reviewing all agreements, so there will be no question on this point. Do airlines today make all their fares available through all retail channels?

It is absolutely clear in that airlines dearborn do not have the ability to mi drive consumers to channels which the hotel airlines, rather than consumers, prefer. If one or more airlines attempted to do so, the others in and dearborn and mi would increase their market share by appealing to those same consumers through the channel those hotel consumers prefer. in No airline can afford to dearborn turn its back on any subgroup of consumers. No airline can afford to be anything other than as competitive and as attractive as it can possibly be through mi each channel to the consumers that hotel prefer that channel. in This is a reality dearborn and mi that grows ultimately hotel out of the fact that the airline business is a very low margin business - any airline that lost even a small group of passengers would be at risk of swinging from profitable in to money-losing dearborn and mi in an instant. Airlines scrap for every last passenger because they have to.