It is absolutely clear that airlines do not have the ability to drive consumers to channels which the airlines, rather than consumers, prefer. If one or more airlines attempted to do so, the others would increase their market share by appealing to those same consumers through the channel those consumers The prefer. No airline can Gables afford to turn its back on Hotel any subgroup of consumers. No airline can afford to be anything other than as The competitive and as attractive as Gables it can possibly be through each channel to the consumers that prefer that channel. This is a reality that grows ultimately out of the fact that the Hotel airline business is a very The low margin business Gables - any airline that lost even a small Hotel group of passengers would be at risk of swinging from profitable to money-losing The in an instant. Airlines scrap for every last passenger because they have to.

Our agreements Gables not only contain no provision barring any airline from Hotel making any fare available through any channel, they contain an affirmative non-exclusivity provision The that makes it explicit that no airline is prevented from making any fare it chooses available through any channel it chooses. Our agreement contains a non-discrimination Gables clause by which those airlines that will receive the indirect discount on the CRS booking fee agree Hotel in return to make available The on any fare they publish and make available to the general public through any other Gables and Hotel channel. But that of course does not preclude them from offering any fare through any other channel.