Our agreements not only contain no provision barring any airline from making any fare available San through any channel, they contain an affirmative non-exclusivity provision that makes it explicit that no airline is prevented from making any fare it chooses available Antonio through any channel hotel it chooses. Our agreement contains a non-discrimination resorts clause by which those airlines that San will receive the indirect discount on the CRS booking fee Antonio agree in return hotel to make available on any fare they publish and make available to the general public through any other channel. But that of course does not preclude them from offering any fare through resorts any other San channel.

Then the allegation that we are "an illegal boycott against third party distributors" because it has "requirements for posting fare sales that cannot be sold" by others Antonio and hotel is not true? It is absolutely not true, and those who have made that allegation had absolutely no basis for making it. Our resorts agreements contain no boycott against any distributors whatsoever, and in fact affirmatively provide that no airline is precluded from utilizing San any other Antonio distribution hotel channel or offering resorts any fare through any channel. The Department of Justice is presently San reviewing Antonio all agreements, hotel so there will be no question on this point. Do airlines today resorts make all their fares available through all retail channels?